Loading Profile...
New layout on grid version of cover
Was this on purpose? I'm afraid I don't understand the reason for the change (nor do I like it). The grid layout is supposed to be higher density relative to other layouts, but the two columns of articles with pictures is a big step away from that. Also my selection of feeds is light on pictures. With one picture, a feedly default picture wasn't terrible. But with six article pictures and 3 or 4 of them the default visuals (some repeated), the wasted space is undesirable and not visually appealing.
The previous list of unread articles for a selection of feed wasn't critical, but gave me a quick look at where there were feeds with new articles I might want to navigate to directly. And the photo feed, though useless (especially with a link that appeared to be hard coded) was easy to ignore.
Also the inline expansion is broken.
The previous list of unread articles for a selection of feed wasn't critical, but gave me a quick look at where there were feeds with new articles I might want to navigate to directly. And the photo feed, though useless (especially with a link that appeared to be hard coded) was easy to ignore.
Also the inline expansion is broken.
1
person has this problem
I have this problem, too!
Tell me when someone solves it.
The more people who report this problem, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who report this problem, the more it gets noticed.
The company marked this problem solved.
Create a customer community for your own organization
Plans starting at $19/month
-
Inappropriate?Hi Phil. The change is indeed in purpose. The goal is to cater users who does not have categories defined and take advantage of the recommendation metadata we collect (we grew 10x in the last 8 weeks).
The inlining was a bug (fixed in 2.x.046).
If you want a column driven overview, you might want to try the column flavor of the cover. If a lot of people revolt, we will consider rolling back the change but on our user testing, new users which did not have a lot of categories responded really well so we are going to give it a chance. -
Inappropriate?Thanks, I think I'll try digest again.
EMPLOYEE
