Loading Profile...
EMPLOYEE
Question settlement escalation
A couple of users have asked if there is an escalation process if they disagree with the question settlement. At the moment there isn't however I'd like to try something out. What I am proposing is when a settlement is disputed I will post the dispute here and you can comment what you think the correct settlement should be. We will then use the consensus to re-settle the question. I'm just checking with the user if he is happy for me to copy his email here (not including personal details of course).
3
people like this idea
I like this idea!
Tell me when this idea gets some attention.
The more people who like this idea, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who like this idea, the more it gets noticed.
Create a customer community for your own organization
Plans starting at $19/month
-
Inappropriate?I personally think that's a great idea. We haven't had anyone do anything quite like that, and it sounds like a great, open way to solicit opinions and come to a consensus. Soon, by the way, you'll have the ability to note (sort of like voting) when you think the answer has been given or a consensus has been reached. That might work great for this idea you have.
I’m liking your idea a lot
-
Inappropriate?Great idea!! This will also help build community involvement.
I’m thinking this is a good idea
-
Inappropriate?Questions that do not have a clear settlement should be voided. There should be no question as to the events. In the event of a question that is unclear, simply void and state reason why, maybe include idea for way question could be worded more clearly. I think questions should be cut and dry, no room for arguement, in that case just void and move forward.
-
Inappropriate?Destry,
If all the questions on Hubdub were perfectly clear I would agree with you, but as it stands now things are not always so clear. Given the current state of Hubdub, I can't conceive of a better method of resolving settlement disputes than community input and a decision by the Hubdub team.
The team has been remarkably positive about allowing all profits on disputed questions, and resettling with those who lost in initial settlements so that they also receive profit.
I’m thinking I've created more questions here than on Hubdub!
-
Inappropriate?I also feel the staff at hubdub is doing an amazing job. I think the standard default position is that if a question is in doubt and there is no clear way to settle, just void question and return wagers. I don't wager on questions that I don't feel can be settled clearly. I think if more people read settlement details, and questions were voided if there was a potential question then that would force people making questions to be clearer. I think if a question is flagged and then suspended until it can be reviewed that would help with settlement issue.
I would volunteer to review questions that were flagged and agree not to wager on those questions I reviewed. That has been my suggestion for a group of power users that had ability to review questions, suspend questions, and send those that were still questionable to the category editors, not only could we build a better community, we each would feel more comfortable wagering on questions.
We even could have all new questions in a suspend status until the power users could review and a consensus could be reached to open question to wagering.
I’m excited
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE
