Loading Profile...
1.0 vs. 2.0
IS there a comparison chart showing features and differences between PB Wiki 1.0 and 2.0? Need to present to team to decide which one to go with depending on functionality, security, access, etc. Thank You!
I’m curious
1
person has this question
I have this question, too!
Tell me when someone answers.
The more people who ask this question, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who ask this question, the more it gets noticed.
Create a customer community for your own organization
Plans starting at $19/month
-
Inappropriate?Hi Becks,
We strongly suggest that you choose 2.0. We are not supporting the features of 1.0 and we are not adding new features to it.
Anything you can do in 1.0 should be better in 2.0. The only exception is the fact that we dropped support for the wiki markup language in 2.0.
Thanks for asking.
-
-
Inappropriate?for example:
- invitation key / password methodology for both
- page level access (who/how)
- safety & security features (contributor levels) for both
- need for account versus not
etc.
I’m thankful
-
Inappropriate?Pbwiki 2.0 requires pbwiki accounts. it also removed the wiki markup as Clif mentioned. Pbwiki 2.0 also isn't really accessible for PDAs and other such devices because it's a bit heavier on the html/javascript side (in particular the WYSIWYG editor).
Other than that, 2.0 is more reliable, has better access control, organization tools, api support, user administration, and visual editors, as well as being actively developed so critical bugs are eventually resolved.
For my money, if you've got a small use case with minimal requirements and computer saavy users, then pbwiki 1.0 is probably the way to go, but for most people, pbwiki 2.0 is the right solution.
