Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
Alex replied on November 03, 2009 01:50 to the problem "Possible abuse of GQ bonus energy potion system" in Kramaley Games:
I just feel that Dave has got to be fair about punishing, and also do something to make up for their mistakes. Why just single out CrazyBoomz when the problem lies in the fact that the Dave came up with the items, and people start to buy it? - If Dave feel that CrazyBoomz must be punish like this by rolling back, what about being fair to those who bought lots of it like Lexx? Admit the mistakes made and do something about it, and dont just blame the people who abuse it because no cap was set initially.
Ryan - gaining 3 levels a day dont make us guilty. Its not about too good to be true when Dave put up this thing. We work hard hunting for the gears, and selling them for gold, and it is only fair to us to use this great amount of gold on the items (which here is the E boost). People who cant afford them, its just too bad.
Alex replied on November 02, 2009 09:05 to the problem "Possible abuse of GQ bonus energy potion system" in Kramaley Games:
First thing first...
1) Those without the capabilities to purchase and use those potions .. Shut up and dont poke your nose in because you cannot afford that much like CrazyBoomz and Lexx.. and also you learned of the trick too late to do anything about it?
2) Mem - if i m not wrong, did they broke any of the rules? Who are you to judge who is cheating, when people like me view it as tactical? - Perhaps its a norm that we all know multi is wrong, but having alot of gold to purchase alot of E booast is nothing wrong at all.
3) People like us have so much gold, and there isent much things to do with them. When the E booast came out, we stil thought we finally got a place to use our gold. But then what they dave did literally Killed our idea. Once again our gold are set to rot ....
For all you guys know, there are people who played fairly. Dont just accuse when things happened in a way that you guys cannot achieve it. I have no say about what happened for CrazyBoomz scenrio (even though i feel that rolling back is an unfair way of doing things), i believe Lexx situation is different.
So dave, may i ask a question? Do people who spend alot of gold getting the E boost get refunds? If not, can we say we are being tricked into purchasing them thus making a huge loss? - In the same way, if we who bought lots of the E boost cannot get refund, and is not being treated fairly with due respect, why would you guys wan to rollback CrazyBoomz?
At least have fair treatment for everyone. Do not just punish people, and not compensate when error occured on the expenses of the players.
Summary - If people who bought alot of th E boost does not need to be refunded, i guess CrazyBoomz do not deserved to be roll backed too.
Alex replied on August 11, 2009 16:07 to the question "Freeze gear equipped for an hour after attacks are made." in Kramaley Games:
Well, i am supportive of the devs idea. Basically its only fair for people who have an uber disadvantage (be it in offensive or defensive). Yes, people do care about their streaks, and this change is going to make the game more challanging in everyway it can. Let me ask all those Pvpers a question - U can easily gain streak by killing People with very low gear too, doesnt it makes the game pointless to have such streaks anymore?
- The point here is that with such improvement from the Developers, i am pretty sure they are able to earn even more $$ in a sense that people are willng to spend more on Offensive + defensive gear. It balances up those impenetrable armour, which proves to be of high disadvantages to most of us Pvpers too.
Its simple guys. If you are too afraid to lose your streaks, dont even consider pvping. But people who are up for the challange - Go ahead and you will be well respected.
Another thing would be that it balances the part on people who wants to use full offensive gear on PVPing, as right now, because of this People will have to strategize even more on how to wear their equips in a sense that the 4 min is a crucial .
Once again thanks Dave for such great improvement. The balancing up does help out alot, it does shows that who are the ones who only dares to turtle up and whines about their streaks.
Alex replied on August 05, 2009 23:24 to the question "Gear Quest 3.0 - Ideas" in Kramaley Games:
Well, if i have to vote, i would vote for the PVP option, but like wylin said i would prefered to have the Items trade windows - http://www.getsatisfaction.com/kramal...
- was hoping the Dev would look at my suggestion again.
Alex replied on August 05, 2009 23:08 to the idea "Trade Windows for items to items trade" in Kramaley Games:
Alex replied on July 29, 2009 01:28 to the idea "Trade Windows for items to items trade" in Kramaley Games:
Alex replied on July 16, 2009 10:30 to the idea "Trade Windows for items to items trade" in Kramaley Games:
-
Alex started following the idea "SPELL BOOKS!" in Kramaley Games.
Alex replied on July 09, 2009 23:21 to the idea "Trade Windows for items to items trade" in Kramaley Games:
| next » « previous |
Loading Profile...
